Tag: private equity

Remembering Private Equity Pioneer Ted Forstmann

Ted Forstmann, a major private equity dealmaker in the leveraged buyout wave of the 1980s and the first to describe corporate takeover firms as “barbarians at the gate,” will be remembered as a pioneer in the private equity business. Yet despite his early success in highly leveraged finance deals, he later became a critic of using junk bonds that he said saddled companies with too much debt.

Forstmann, who died Sunday of brain cancer at 71, founded the investment firm, Forstmann Little & Co. in 1978 and participated in major buyouts of companies including Topps, the baseball trading card manufacturer, Dr. Pepper, General Instrument and Gulfstream. Most recently, he has been focused on IMG, the sports and marketing firm he acquired in 2004 that represents athletes and celebrities including Derek Jeter, Heidi Klum and Tiger Woods.

“Teddy Forstmann was one of the early pioneers of our industry and we will all mourn his loss,” says Rob Newbold, managing principal of the investment firm Graham Partners in Newtown Square, Pa. and co-chairman of the Wharton Private Equity Partnership.

Wharton finance professor Bulent Gultekin, who teaches the school’s advanced seminar on private equity, says Forstmann, along with others including Michael Milken and the founders of the buyout firm Kohlberg, Kravis Roberts & Co., transformed American business. At the time, he notes, the U.S. stock market was undervalued with a price-to-earnings ratio of 6.

“It was the beginning of the restructuring of corporate America. It speeded everything up and forced companies to be more efficient. For the first time there was a challenge to corporate control from the outside,” says Gultekin. Prior to the rise of private equity funds, he adds, companies used cash or stock to acquire one another in more genteel merger agreements.

Under pressure from raiders, managements became lean and focused on core businesses. Globalization was, in part, an outgrowth of the buyout era as managers sought better returns by moving production to low-cost developing nations, Gultekin says.

As the value of leverage buyout deals escalated, Forstmann began to grow concerned about industry excess and called the junk bonds used to finance highly leveraged transactions “wampum” or “funny money.” “Every week, with ever-increasing levels of irresponsibility, many billions of dollars in American assets are being saddled with debt that has virtually no chance of being repaid,” Forstmann wrote in a 1988 Wall Street Journal opinion article.

Forstmann was golfing with Richard Gelb, the former chairman of Bristol Meyers, in the late 1980s when the two began to discuss the buyout frenzy. Gelb asked Forstmann what all the deal-making meant. “It means the barbarians are at the gate,” Mr. Forstmann told Gelb. “And they’ll be coming for you next.” The phrase was used in the title of the best-selling 1990 book about the buyout of RJR Nabisco.

Despite its early success, Forstmann’s firm suffered after making ill-timed investments in telecommunications as the Internet technology bubble collapsed in the early 2000s. In all, Forstmann’s firm made 31 investments and returned more than $15 billion to investors, according to IMG.

In addition to his career in finance, Forstmann was a leading philanthropist donating millions to charity. He was an early proponent of voucher programs for education in the 1990s that eventually led to the charter schools movement. Moved by Nelson Mandela’s efforts to help orphaned children in South Africa, Forstmann donated $1 million to the cause. He later became the guardian of two South African orphans and raised them in New York.

With an outsized personality, Forstmann was highly visible in the New York social scene and dated glamorous models and celebrities including Princess Diana, who later became a close friend. But it will be for his role as a leader in the early days of private equity that Forstmann will be remembered most. According to Gultekin, “I see the impact of that group as really changing the American corporate landscape.”

Featured Professors:
Posted in Finance and Investment, Knowledge@Wharton Today | Also tagged | Leave a comment

Innovative Financing

Besides looking for the most commercially viable, innovative enterprises to invest in, Geneva-based Bamboo Finance also looks for another trait – investment targets that bring a direct, positive benefit to low-income communities by providing access to health care, sanitation, clean water, housing and the like.

Having a socially positive impact while making a profit can be a huge challenge for a private equity (PE) firm like Bamboo. But it looks like it has scored an early success through its stake in Vaatsalya Healthcare of India, which serves patients typically subsisting on less than $2 a day. Vaatsalya has grown from three 50-bed hospitals to 12 in just three years and has expanded services to include pharmacies and radiology.

According to an article in the Financial Times, many institutional investors might be interested in funding efforts by private equity firms and others that take on social impact development projects. But one thing holding them back is a lack of good ways to measure the value of any social impact alongside any profits from the investments.

“The principal reasons that investors are reluctant to adopt [social] impact investing approaches seem to be a lack of belief in the metrics used to measure social impact and a pervasive concern that taking on board parallel financial and developmental factors naturally prejudices the latter and erodes the former,” the article notes. “While there is much anecdotal evidence to suggest a link between the two, accurately disaggregating the effect of developmental impact from other factors is a complex task.”

Bamboo’s goal is to prove private equity firms can succeed in all measures, that “it’s possible to have both an attractive financial return and a significant social impact,” says Eric Berkowitz, a principal, while acknowledging it can be difficult to quantify social benefits.

He is hoping that the investment Bamboo has made in Vaatsalya – taking a 21% stake – will help set the pace in developing some form of dual metrics. Over the next five years, Bamboo hopes to build 40 hospitals to serve one million people in India, provide university education for at least 12,000 students in Mexico, develop affordable housing for 2,300 families in Pakistan, put more than 13,000 automatic teller machines in rural communities and provide electricity to over 166,000 user in rural India.

Still, measuring social impact will always be a challenge. “How do you compare the social metrics of a company providing student loans in Mexico versus a health-care company in India?” Berkowitz asked. “You know, it’s like apples and oranges. There are a lot of initiatives that are underway now that are trying to reconcile this, but right now we haven’t found an initiative or a standardization that makes sense to us.”

Posted in Business Ethics, Finance and Investment, Health Economics, Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Knowledge@Wharton Today | Also tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Stuck in the Middle with You

Long ago and far away, before the great financial crisis, swashbuckling private equity (PE) groups were on a relentless march toward ever-bigger deals. The industry, of course, took a big tumble with the Great Recession. But then last year came a renewed buzz – signs of the return of mega-deals. The industry was hoping that a benchmark-setting $10 billion deal was imminent, which would signal the return of boom times. It never happened.

As the Financial Times points out today, “At about US$5 billion, or US$6 billion with debt, last week’s deal by Apax Partners to buy Kinetic, the U.S. wound-care specialist, is set to become the biggest post-crisis deal by private equity.” Big perhaps, but not the big enchilada hoped for last year.

There are myriad reasons why the bigger deals are elusive, with many observers citing as most notable the skimpy supply of attractive targets. The FT article goes on to point out something Knowledge@Wharton had reported in the recently published “2011 Wharton Private Equity Review: Gradually Regaining Ground”: With large potential targets elusive, PE investors increasing are looking to the mid-sized market.

A Review article titled, “As ‘Megadeals’ Lose Luster, Mid-sized Companies Are Becoming More Attractive,” notes that “private-equity investors are increasingly focusing on strong middle-market companies that are ready to expand. Investments in such companies demand less capital than larger deals and have greater flexibility when it comes to cashing out. This makes middle-market investing particularly attractive to private equity firms at a time when money remains tight and fund-raising is challenging in the wake of the recession and global financial crunch.”

The article notes that panelists at the Wharton Private Equity and Venture Capital Conference pointed out that PE firms have become more interested in middle-market companies with annual revenues of between $250 million to $1 billion and that also have strong managements and strategies

Companies that “are doing well in their niche” but lack the skills to expand into new areas” are particularly attractive, said Craig Bondy, a principal at GTCR Golder Rauner in Chicago. PE firms that acquire such companies can then apply strategic guidance and operational expertise, Bondy noted during the panel titled, “Middle Market: Identifying and Creating Sustainable Competitive Advantages.”

Learn more about recent trends in private equity in the latest Wharton Private Equity Review and also at our new website specializing in private equity: Knowledge@Wharton on Private Equity.

Posted in Finance and Investment, Knowledge@Wharton Today | Also tagged , | 2 Comments

Private Equity Survives to Fight Another Day

The private equity (PE) industry, like most others, took a big hit from the global financial crises. Yet, PE has rebounded and is in much better shape today than many analysts had projected. This better-than-expected position is thanks to relatively strong capital reserves going into the downturn and flexibility on the part of bank creditors that led to lower interest rates for PE investments.

Today, the industry continues to face challenges from the slow-growth U.S. economy, but it still sees a lot of potential opportunities in emerging markets, and in select industry sectors and asset classes – notably technology, mid-market companies and distressed companies.

Globally, certain emerging markets are considered highly attractive because their economic growth rates are likely to far outperform more developed countries. That has led PE and venture capital investors to focus on reaching vast numbers of new middle class consumers in China, India, Southeast Europe and Latin America. The top targets for investment there include companies in the Internet, financial services and clean technology sectors.

Technology more generally has been one of the few bright spots in an otherwise underperforming U.S. economy, and mid-market companies are especially attractive to PE investors now because they demand less capital than larger deals and have greater cash-out flexibility. Those are key qualities, given that fund-raising remains challenging as the economy tries to fight its way out of a long run bout of sluggish growth.

Another area attracting increasing PE investor interest: distressed companies, which had been hoping for better times but are becoming less and less able to wait it out. Troubled companies that have renegotiated bank loans six or seven times will need to resort to other, options with many turning to PE firms. Among the sectors most likely to provide distressed opportunities are real estate, finance and health care.

This all reflects the consensus at the most recent Wharton Private Equity and Venture Capital Conference, and the thinking is captured in greater detail in the just-published 2011 Wharton Private Equity Review.

Access the latest Wharton Private Equity Review and additional Knowledge@Wharton stories on private equity here:

Posted in Finance and Investment, Knowledge@Wharton Today | Also tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Private Equity Pushes East

Everybody it seems — from banks to corporations involved in consumer or business-to-business goods and services – is looking toward key emerging markets and Asia as the strongest areas of economic growth in coming years. You can add private equity firms to that list, too.

For these specialized investors, the booming economies in Asia and the developing world offer attractive investment opportunities – from health care to wireless technology, says Glenn Hutchins, co-founder and co-CEO of Silver Lake, a global private equity investment firm. He made the comments at the 2011 Wharton Private Equity and Venture Capital Conference, where he also added technology as a more general category for private equity investors to target.

“If you can position yourself in a growing part of the U.S. and the global economy, there is a very bright future ahead of you,” said Hutchins, whose firm has $14 billion in assets and offices in New York, California, Europe and Asia.

Despite that bright outlook, the economic drag of the financial crisis continues to make the recovery far weaker than those that have typically followed downturns in the U.S. and other developed parts of the world, Hutchins said. “Usually, the deeper down you go the steeper you come back.” But this time, the “bounce back is anemic by contrast.” Hutchins is a former adviser to President Clinton on health care and economic policy. He also is chairman of SunGard Corp., a software and technology services provider, and a director of companies including telecommunications provider MCI and TD Ameritrade Holding Corp.

The notion that recessions caused by a financial crisis tend to be much deeper and longer than the average recession has been documented going back a couple of hundred years by Carmen M. Reinhart and Kenneth Rogoff in their book, This Time Is Different: Eight Centuries of Financial Folly.

Looking five years ahead, Hutchins predicted the global economy will expand through 2015, with most of the growth coming in Asia and other parts of the developing world. Silver Lake is gearing up for this, he said. Employees are told, “You may not like the food. You may not like the jet lag. You may not like missing your kid’s soccer game, but you’ve got to go” to the emerging markets, particularly Asia. “Not only that, but we’re going to move you there.”

To read the full Knowledge@Wharton article about Hutchins’ views on the future of private equity and the global economy, see this article from the soon-to-be published, 2011 Wharton Private Equity Review: Battling Headwinds: Private Equity’s ‘Bright Future’ in Technology and Developing Economies.

And here is Knowledge@Wharton’s recent article on the economic outlook: The Economy: When Will Happy Days Be Here Again?

 

Posted in Finance and Investment, Knowledge@Wharton Today | Also tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

India’s Private Equity Market Is Back

Foreign investment flows to India are on the rise as part of the general movement of capital towards emerging markets, the world’s growth engines of the future. And private equity (PE) is one area clearly picking up in India largely thanks to outside money, according to panel members at the recent Wharton India Economic Forum.

Although India’s overall economy barely suffered, PE investment in India took a big hit during financial crisis because of the blow that PE absorbed globally. Some 80% of PE funds in India come from foreign funds. As PE funds have bounced back over the last year with the world economy, many investors are focusing more on emerging markets with the greatest growth potential, such as India and Brazil.

While acknowledging solid potential gains for PE investors, participants on a panel titled “Private Equity: Investing in India – Getting Higher Returns” urged caution, most notably around governance, income tax and general regulatory issues, which remain huge challenges in India. Panelists also noted that India offers a fragmented PE market, often involving family owned businesses and minority stakes, and with little to no opportunities for leveraged buy-outs.

Mukund Krishnaswami, a founding partner of Lighthouse Funds, a PE company that manages $150 million in India, also warned investors to be “careful of betting big” on the things everybody wants to bet on. “The things you hear are hot today are not going to be hot in three to four years. What matters is what is in demand three, four or five years” in the future. “PE is about getting out” and so the question is, “can you return money to investors? The drivers today may not be the drivers in 2015.”

Krishnaswami recommends that investors be “opportunistic and cast a wide net.” Rather than focusing on one industry, PE firms should be generalists that try to take advantage of mega trends. For example, India is noted for its young population and huge trend towards urbanization. “But what does that mean for investors?” Not everyone is moving into the biggest cities. Instead, people from the country tend to move to tier 4-sized cities, and those in tier 4 cities tend to move to tier 3 cities, etc. “That is the shift,” Krishnaswami said. The trick is to know how consumer needs and aspirations differ at each level and to direct investments in a more nuanced way. Part of making successful PE investments in India will be “understanding what is the micro trend below the macro trend.”

Nevertheless, the maco trend in real estate looks like a good bet, said Gulbir Madan, founder and chairman of Brahma Management. “The big story is the domestic demand story.” There is a “huge demand for residential real estate that is just getting organized.” Anything with good management should do well, he added. More generally, investors should be prepared for “a long-term commitment.” Expect a “lock up of at least 10 years — everything takes longer than it should, and so investors must be extremely patient.”

Madan and other panelists also cautioned that pricing in the PE market generally in India has recovered from the financial crisis and is again on the high side.

Posted in Finance and Investment, Knowledge@Wharton Today, Real Estate | Also tagged , , | 1 Comment

The Urge to Merge

Merger and acquisition activity looks set to rise in 2011, according to a new survey by Knowledge@Wharton and KPMG LLP.

Nearly two-thirds of respondents to the survey were more optimistic about the merger and acquisition (M&A) environment this year compared with their attitudes a year earlier. Key reasons for the higher optimism include a more stable economic environment, stronger buyer confidence and improved debt and equity markets.

The survey, conducted by Knowledge@Wharton in collaboration with KPMG LLP, generated 992 responses from executives at public companies, private firms, and hedge and private equity funds. Over half of the respondents were active buyers last year.

Three industries are likely to lead the M&A activity, respondents noted: banking, financial services and health care.

Just this morning Sanofi-Aventis, the French pharma company, announced it will buy Genzyme under a $20 billion cash deal (plus performance-related payments). It was the largest acquisition in the last two years in pharma and the second-largest ever in biotech.

Other industries likely to see relatively strong M&A activity include energy and technology. Additional drivers of growth this year, according to the survey, include an interest in:  increasing revenues, growing market share, extending geographic reach and entering new business lines.

Two-thirds of respondents think North America will be the most active in M&A, with China and India expected to be the next most active markets. But overall, North America remains the world leader in M&A volume. In the U.S., despite a slight drop in the fourth quarter of 2010, M&A activity for the year was well ahead of 2009. Last year, 445 deals in the U.S. totaled $33.9 billion, according to Dow Jones, a 17% increase in deal activity from 2009.

Dan Tiemann, KPMG’s Americas region transactions and restructuring leader, notes, “At the end of 2008 and through 2009, companies were retrenching. They were worried about profitability and some were even concerned with survival. Now, those who survived want to grow again and are armed with the cash and the stronger stock valuations to do so.”

Saikat Chaudhuri, a Wharton management professor, agrees. During an economic crisis, M&A is used more for survival than for growth. “Now, as we are coming out of the crisis, companies don’t want to miss new opportunities. Leaders want to extend their lead.”

But Chaudhuri cautions that the recovery may not be uniform and smooth. “There will be hiccups along the way…. Employment may lag. The debt market may take longer to recover than anticipated. Overall, it will take a while to come out of this mess – a few years at least.” He advises prospective acquirers to look at growth activities with a medium- to long-term time horizon in mind.

The joint survey was sponsored by KPMG LLP.

Download a white paper with the survey results below:

Knowledge@Wharton/KPMG LLC M&A Survey

Featured Professors:
Posted in Finance and Investment, Knowledge@Wharton Today, Leadership and Change, Strategic Management | Also tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment