Tag: Labor Issues

Why Walmart Is Enlisting Veterans

walmart newWalmart’s announcement yesterday that it would offer jobs to veterans may well be a good business move as well as a way to bolster its recently tarnished image. A strike last October by Walmart workers in California extended to the day after Thanksgiving at locations across the U.S. The protests were chiefly over wages and working conditions.

Walmart said it would offer a job to any honorably discharged veteran in his or her first 12 months off duty. It expects to hire up to 100,000 veterans in the next five years. “Hiring a veteran can be one of the best business decisions you make,” said Bill Simon, the company’s U.S. president and CEO, in yesterday’s announcement. He noted that veterans have a record of performance under pressure, and are quick learners and team players. He also sees them as “leaders with discipline, training and a passion for service.” Walmart today needs the “seriousness and sense of purpose that the military instills,” he added.

Peter Cappelli, director of Wharton’s Center for Human Resources, feels veterans bring “personal discipline.” Matthew Bidwell, Wharton management professor, rates Walmart’s move as a “great initiative” from a company with reputation issues. Below are excerpts of comments from Cappelli and Bidwell on Walmart’s announcement:

K@WToday: Are there good business reasons for a company to hire veterans, or does it serve mostly as a public relations gesture?

Cappelli: It does both. The jobs Walmart has are not ones that require a lot of skill. What they require is personal discipline, and veterans are more likely to have that.

Bidwell: I think it is a PR gesture and something that may well support the business. Veterans may often have developed important skills in the military, and they represent an important pool of labor. Walmart’s size combined with its high turnover rate mean that it always needs to hire large numbers of employees. Going to veterans as an important source makes sense. Of course, they would have been hiring a lot of veterans anyway. What is interesting is that it is offering to hire any veteran who wants a job. That’s what is eye catching here. 

K@WToday: Do veterans bring some special qualities? Are they particularly suitable for functions like HR or quality control? 

Cappelli: I don’t think Walmart is thinking about [tying] all its jobs to this promise. I’m sure it refers to front-line workers in stores. [“Most of these jobs will be in Walmart stores and clubs, and some will be in distribution centers and the Home Office,” says the Walmart statement.] 

Bidwell: Obviously the military trains very well for some roles. It’s worth remembering how broad the military is, though, in terms of all the jobs that it encompasses. That makes it quite hard to generalize. 

K@WToday: Is there a downside, however small, to hiring veterans? 

Cappelli: None that I see. Veterans are like other people, just pre-screened and given experiences that create personal discipline. There are veterans who have problems associated with combat, but there are non-vets with problems as well. 

Bidwell: None. One other point: This is a great initiative by Walmart, but/and it comes from a firm that generally has a poor reputation on employment issues. On the one hand, this could help to improve its image. On the other hand, it would be even better if a firm that was known for treating its employees better was showing this interest in veterans. 

K@WToday: Will veterans need special training to work in the corporate sector? 

Cappelli: There isn’t a lot of training in these jobs, for veterans or non-veterans. 

Bidwell: Corporate life and the different nature of authority and obedience can take some getting used to. Most people, however, don’t have too much trouble with that.

 

Featured Professors: ,
Posted in Knowledge@Wharton Today | Also tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

No Winners in 13-Day Maruti Strike

The 13-day strike at Maruti Suzuki, India’s largest automobile manufacturer, has ended with an agreement being signed late on Thursday. The strike at the Manesar plant in the northern Indian state of Haryana was over the issue of forming a second trade union with external affiliations. The company already has an older union — the Maruti Udyog Kamgar Union — that is dominated by workers from the older Gurgaon plant, near Delhi. Manesar workers have denounced this union as management-owned.

The accord entails the management taking lenient action against the striking workers, including reinstating 11 sacked employees. But it is silent on the formation of the new union. Haryana labor minister Shiv Charan Sharma, who has been the main mediator, says that the union is very much on the agenda. “Forming a union will take a little longer as [the workers] first have to apply and then get it approved by the government,” he notes. “It is the workers’ right to form a union.”

This is really the key issue. Several multinationals that have set up shop in India have been accustomed to more pliable labor in their home countries. They would rather interact with the workers through “works committees.” This has been unacceptable in many places. There have been strikes at units of Nokia, Toyota, Volvo and Hyundai on this issue, though the upfront demand has been higher pay.

Maruti is 28 years old in India: Shouldn’t the company have known the industrial climate by now? But company sources point out that they have been able to keep outside unions at bay all this time, so why should they surrender on this issue? The all-India trade unions (TUs) have been actively supporting the Maruti workers. They had set up a joint action committee and threatened to get a half million workers on strike in the Haryana auto belt, of which Maruti is a part. In recent times, Big Labor has been losing out in India, so the national TUs need to flex their muscles.

Maruti has been planning a change in strategy as far as its product line-up and marketing focus are concerned. It can ill afford to lose management time over labor issues. Also, the Indian auto industry is facing speed bumps after a heady growth year. There is a general slowdown in the economy. Galloping inflation – over 9% in May – has forced the Reserve Bank of India to raise interest rates. The latest hike — 25 basis points on Thursday — will further depress the demand for car loans and, therefore, dampen auto sector sales, analysts predict.

Posted in Knowledge@Wharton Today | Also tagged , , | Leave a comment